From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32902 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ot26t-0007W3-8O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:37:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Ot26s-0007P2-3X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:37:31 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6963)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Ot26r-0007Ov-Te
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:37:30 -0400
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o87HbStk018542
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:37:29 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:31:30 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20100907173130.GA18949@redhat.com>
References: <20100906115026.GA16300@redhat.com>
 <m3bp89yj9t.fsf@trasno.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3bp89yj9t.fsf@trasno.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] -stable patch (was Re: [PATCHv2] qemu: e1000 fix TOR
	math)
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:50:38AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Patch b0b900070c7cb29bbefb732ec00397abe5de6d73 made
> > TOR valuer incorrect: the spec says it should always
> > include the CRC field.
> > No one seems to use this field, but better to stick to spec.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for the v2 O:-)

BTW, I think this patch is good for the release branch.

-- 
MST