All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: "Alejandro Riveira Fernández" <ariveira@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.35.4: sudo rmmod ahci @ 2.6.35.4 succeeds: filesystem access errors follow
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:49:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009082049.54128.pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C87D5E9.1060307@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Wednesday 08 September 2010 19:28:57 Stefan Richter wrote:
> Pedro Francisco wrote:
> > That makes no sense. That's what the force option "-f" is for. It's my
> > opinion the usage count for ahci on `lsmod' should be 1 and not 0.
> > Whoever still wants to remove it can use the `rmmod -f ahci'
> 
> The usage count of a module is only there to ensure that function calls
> into the module succeed.  As long as some other part of the kernel has a
> pointer of a function in the module, removal of the module needs to be
> prevented.
> 
> "rmmod ahci" on the other hand is something like pulling the SATA cable. 
> Or ejection of the controller from an ExpressCard slot.  The driver
> shutdown causes the controller device and thus its child devices (disk
> devices behind the controller) to go away, and that's it.  You can do also
> # echo $DEVICE_ID > /sys/module/ahci/drivers/pci\:ahci/unbind
> which tells the driver to let go of the controller.

Hum ok... Still I find it weird since on 2.6.32 I've, after `lsmod | grep -i 
ahci':
ahci                   32200  4
and on 2.6.35.4:
ahci                   32200  0

Why the change of behaviour? Is it because of the split of libahci from ahci ?

-- 
Pedro

      reply	other threads:[~2010-09-08 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-07 17:34 2.6.35.4: sudo rmmod ahci @ 2.6.35.4 succeeds: filesystem access errors follow Pedro Francisco
2010-09-07 18:21 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-07 21:47   ` Pedro Francisco
2010-09-08 18:28     ` Stefan Richter
2010-09-08 19:49       ` Pedro Francisco [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201009082049.54128.pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com \
    --to=pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com \
    --cc=ariveira@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.