From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius =?ISO-8859-1?B?R3L2Z2Vy?= <marius.groeger@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Interlace modes with r600 KMS
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:14:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20100910091435.59e565ff@htpc>
References: <4C85EC2B.6050100@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTinr=HV5T5qah3sn4MsHxMbN74HZFbkrdDSFVrri@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C865D4C.30703@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTikerfovnOJ+7bAR4mbwNPMsVAJuRzeKoLpXTSb9@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C867F1D.2090501@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTin-L9TVryDxKHJyAB4a7Bpq3Ui2Pa=rOz9A5XwH@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C869B83.3010507@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTi=grGdovdKQ66AeUEGRH+kxoyYyqpnBcHyQ0J0j@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C872939.7090302@googlemail.com>
	<AANLkTi=_6JdBPvP5X+K53h+xx_MdrBOBQu-4bPckEDJ0@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com (mail-ey0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.215.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156009EF9E
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eye22 with SMTP id 22so1685725eye.36
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_6JdBPvP5X+K53h+xx_MdrBOBQu-4bPckEDJ0@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:03:54 -0400
wrote Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>:

> Does disabling underscan fix interlaced?

Yes, without underscan I can switch to my manually defined interlace
mode and it looks ok.

However, the EDID reported interlace modes are still pruned by the
Xserver, so there still seems to be a subtle difference between KMS and
UMS.

Thanks
Marius