All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.36-rc1] unmount livelock due to racing with bdi-flusher threads
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:41:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100913024128.GC411@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100821084126.GE31488@dastard>

ping?

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 06:41:26PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I just had an umount take a very long time burning a CPU the entire
> time. It wasn't the unmount thread, either, it was the the bdi
> flusher thread for the the filesystem being unmounted. It was
> spinning with this perf top trace:
> 
>            553144.00 76.9% writeback_inodes_wb  [kernel.kallsyms]
>            106434.00 14.8% __ticket_spin_lock   [kernel.kallsyms]
>             25646.00  3.6% __ticket_spin_unlock [kernel.kallsyms]
>             10512.00  1.5% _raw_spin_lock       [kernel.kallsyms]
>              9606.00  1.3% put_super            [kernel.kallsyms]
>              7920.00  1.1% __put_super          [kernel.kallsyms]
>              5592.00  0.8% down_read_trylock    [kernel.kallsyms]
>                46.00  0.0% kfree                [kernel.kallsyms]
>                22.00  0.0% __do_softirq         [kernel.kallsyms]
>                19.00  0.0% wb_writeback         [kernel.kallsyms]
>                16.00  0.0% wb_do_writeback      [kernel.kallsyms]
>                 8.00  0.0% queue_io             [kernel.kallsyms]
>                 6.00  0.0% run_timer_softirq    [kernel.kallsyms]
>                 6.00  0.0% local_bh_enable_ip   [kernel.kallsyms]
> 
> This went on for ~7m25s (according to the pmchart trace I had on
> screen) before something broke the livelock by writing the inodes to
> disk (maybe the xfssyncd) and the unmount then completed a couple
> of seconds later.
> 
> From the above profile, I'm assuming that writeback_inodes_wb() was
> seeing pin_sb_for_writeback(sb) failing and moving dirty inodes from
> the the b_io to the b_more_io list, then being called again,
> splicing the inodes on b_more_io back to b_io, and then failed again
> to pin_sb_for_writeback() for each inode, moving them back to the
> b_more_io list....
> 
> This is on 2.6.36-rc1 + the radix tree fixes for writeback.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-13  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-21  8:41 [2.6.36-rc1] unmount livelock due to racing with bdi-flusher threads Dave Chinner
2010-09-13  2:41 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-09-30 21:02   ` Jan Kara
2010-10-01  2:59     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100913024128.GC411@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.