From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:03:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Message-Id: <20100913100305.28542955@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <1284052336-25864-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <20100909175537.GA16681@ericsson.com> <20100909201128.3840431b@hyperion.delvare> <30674.1284351000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <30674.1284351000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Guenter Roeck , Shubhrajyoti D , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:10:00 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:11:28 +0200, Jean Delvare said: > > > Please do NOT CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. We have a mailing list > > dedicated to hardware monitoring, there's no point to add to the 200,000 > > messages (literally) LKML gets every year. The more messages a list > > gets, the fewer readers it has. > > Any way to represent this in the MAINTAINERS file, so that people who come > along in the fugure know that lm-sensors gets special handling in that regard? Unfortunately not. The only way would be to convince the maintainers of scripts/get_maintainer.pl to NOT unconditionally add LKML to its output. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754538Ab0IMIDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:03:19 -0400 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:10025 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754269Ab0IMIDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:03:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:03:05 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Guenter Roeck , Shubhrajyoti D , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm75: some optimisations Message-ID: <20100913100305.28542955@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <30674.1284351000@localhost> References: <1284052336-25864-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <20100909175537.GA16681@ericsson.com> <20100909201128.3840431b@hyperion.delvare> <30674.1284351000@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i586-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:10:00 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:11:28 +0200, Jean Delvare said: > > > Please do NOT CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. We have a mailing list > > dedicated to hardware monitoring, there's no point to add to the 200,000 > > messages (literally) LKML gets every year. The more messages a list > > gets, the fewer readers it has. > > Any way to represent this in the MAINTAINERS file, so that people who come > along in the fugure know that lm-sensors gets special handling in that regard? Unfortunately not. The only way would be to convince the maintainers of scripts/get_maintainer.pl to NOT unconditionally add LKML to its output. -- Jean Delvare