diff for duplicates of <20100913203206.GA2601@ericsson.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index ddc9b49..f654d9f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ You'll see the impact in v3 of the patch.
 > >   * Functions declaration
 > > @@ -462,17 +466,16 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
 > >  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
-> >  	if (data->kind = adt7461)
+> >  	if (data->kind == adt7461)
 > >  		data->temp11[nr] = temp_to_u16_adt7461(data, val);
-> > -	else if (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6680)
+> > -	else if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6680)
 > > -		data->temp11[nr] = temp_to_s8(val) << 8;
-> >  	else if (data->kind = max6646)
+> >  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
 > >  		data->temp11[nr] = temp_to_u8(val) << 8;
 > > +	else if (!(data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT))
 > 
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Not sure about efficiency, but the code looks better that way. Done.
 > > +	if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646)
 > > +		data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_OFFSET;
 > > +
-> > +	if (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6646)
+> > +	if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6646)
 > > +		data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT;
 > > +
 > > +	if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646
@@ -107,36 +107,36 @@ Not sure about efficiency, but the code looks better that way. Done.
 > >  		lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT, &data->temp8[3]);
 > >  		lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_TCRIT_HYST, &data->temp_hyst);
 > >  
-> > -		if (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6646) {
+> > -		if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6646) {
 > > +		if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT) {
 > >  			lm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMP,
 > >  				    MAX6657_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL,
 > >  				    &data->temp11[4]);
 > > @@ -1033,22 +1047,20 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)
 > >  
-> >  		if (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h) = 0) {
+> >  		if (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h) == 0) {
 > >  			data->temp11[1] = h << 8;
 > > -			if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6680
 > > -			 && data->kind != max6646
 > > +			if ((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT)
 > >  			 && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWL,
-> >  					  &l) = 0)
+> >  					  &l) == 0)
 > >  				data->temp11[1] |= l;
 > >  		}
-> >  		if (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h) = 0) {
+> >  		if (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h) == 0) {
 > >  			data->temp11[2] = h << 8;
 > > -			if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6680
 > > -			 && data->kind != max6646
 > > +			if ((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT)
 > >  			 && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHL,
-> >  					  &l) = 0)
+> >  					  &l) == 0)
 > >  				data->temp11[2] |= l;
 > >  		}
 > >  
 > > -		if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646) {
 > > +		if (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_OFFSET) {
 > >  			if (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_OFFSH,
-> >  					  &h) = 0
+> >  					  &h) == 0
 > >  			 && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_OFFSL,
 > 
 > Other than these minor implementation details, the changes look good, I
@@ -145,8 +145,3 @@ Not sure about efficiency, but the code looks better that way. Done.
 As always, excellent feedback. Thanks a lot!
 
 Guenter
-
-_______________________________________________
-lm-sensors mailing list
-lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
-http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 84b7a56..7233ebb 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
  "ref\01284038750-8833-3-git-send-email-guenter.roeck@ericsson.com\0"
  "ref\020100913213030.3573aab7@hyperion.delvare\0"
  "From\0Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 2/7] hwmon: (lm90) Introduce device\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:32:06 +0000\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] hwmon: (lm90) Introduce device feature bits\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:32:06 -0700\0"
  "To\0Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>"
   lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
@@ -55,11 +55,11 @@
  "> >   * Functions declaration\n"
  "> > @@ -462,17 +466,16 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,\n"
  "> >  \tmutex_lock(&data->update_lock);\n"
- "> >  \tif (data->kind = adt7461)\n"
+ "> >  \tif (data->kind == adt7461)\n"
  "> >  \t\tdata->temp11[nr] = temp_to_u16_adt7461(data, val);\n"
- "> > -\telse if (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6680)\n"
+ "> > -\telse if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6680)\n"
  "> > -\t\tdata->temp11[nr] = temp_to_s8(val) << 8;\n"
- "> >  \telse if (data->kind = max6646)\n"
+ "> >  \telse if (data->kind == max6646)\n"
  "> >  \t\tdata->temp11[nr] = temp_to_u8(val) << 8;\n"
  "> > +\telse if (!(data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT))\n"
  "> \n"
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
  "> > +\tif (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646)\n"
  "> > +\t\tdata->flags |= LM90_HAVE_OFFSET;\n"
  "> > +\n"
- "> > +\tif (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6646)\n"
+ "> > +\tif (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6646)\n"
  "> > +\t\tdata->flags |= LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT;\n"
  "> > +\n"
  "> > +\tif (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646\n"
@@ -120,36 +120,36 @@
  "> >  \t\tlm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_CRIT, &data->temp8[3]);\n"
  "> >  \t\tlm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_TCRIT_HYST, &data->temp_hyst);\n"
  "> >  \n"
- "> > -\t\tif (data->kind = max6657 || data->kind = max6646) {\n"
+ "> > -\t\tif (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6646) {\n"
  "> > +\t\tif (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT) {\n"
  "> >  \t\t\tlm90_read16(client, LM90_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMP,\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t\t    MAX6657_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL,\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t\t    &data->temp11[4]);\n"
  "> > @@ -1033,22 +1047,20 @@ static struct lm90_data *lm90_update_device(struct device *dev)\n"
  "> >  \n"
- "> >  \t\tif (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h) = 0) {\n"
+ "> >  \t\tif (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWH, &h) == 0) {\n"
  "> >  \t\t\tdata->temp11[1] = h << 8;\n"
  "> > -\t\t\tif (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6680\n"
  "> > -\t\t\t && data->kind != max6646\n"
  "> > +\t\t\tif ((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT)\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_LOWL,\n"
- "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &l) = 0)\n"
+ "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &l) == 0)\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t\tdata->temp11[1] |= l;\n"
  "> >  \t\t}\n"
- "> >  \t\tif (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h) = 0) {\n"
+ "> >  \t\tif (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHH, &h) == 0) {\n"
  "> >  \t\t\tdata->temp11[2] = h << 8;\n"
  "> > -\t\t\tif (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6680\n"
  "> > -\t\t\t && data->kind != max6646\n"
  "> > +\t\t\tif ((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT)\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_HIGHL,\n"
- "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &l) = 0)\n"
+ "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &l) == 0)\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t\tdata->temp11[2] |= l;\n"
  "> >  \t\t}\n"
  "> >  \n"
  "> > -\t\tif (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646) {\n"
  "> > +\t\tif (data->flags & LM90_HAVE_OFFSET) {\n"
  "> >  \t\t\tif (lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_OFFSH,\n"
- "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &h) = 0\n"
+ "> >  \t\t\t\t\t  &h) == 0\n"
  "> >  \t\t\t && lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_REMOTE_OFFSL,\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Other than these minor implementation details, the changes look good, I\n"
@@ -157,11 +157,6 @@
  "> \n"
  "As always, excellent feedback. Thanks a lot!\n"
  "\n"
- "Guenter\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
- "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
- http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
+ Guenter
 
-e6cff5fafdb7fe92f35ef32b637145ff7e27b45ec466259c85ee4dac1a523975
+3163ba9c068de9a690178183bc7fd591277b267568b3fceeaca6551bb0b1dd6e
