From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <201009171656.56615.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> <201009171550.49282.arnd@arndb.de> <20100917140219.GA9454@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100917140219.GA9454@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Jan Kara , codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry On Friday 17 September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Just add a per-sb mutex inside the filesystem. Given that lock_super > isn't used by the VFS anymore that's actually equivalent. Ok, thanks for the hint. I'll fix that for isofs. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186Ab0IQO5s (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:57:48 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:56812 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754947Ab0IQO5q (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:57:46 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:56:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.35-16-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Jan Kara , codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> <201009171550.49282.arnd@arndb.de> <20100917140219.GA9454@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100917140219.GA9454@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009171656.56615.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:pxF85joxMv4hJDeSCH2F60RWbqf3tqrKpZ1uOBNNffE 7xf0TO4unq0NFaVVaQZ8+1yuECARHRrYSAMc4aCcftVaPh/kuj 5d3Y3ciWuvuH4UmU5qGyQapClWNFGewVUYOPzXzjRVG3pXENxA AVj0DhhvTou5qkpXFdjXF7aikDxEutvqRVqyBGYtgv5b2vFAhU M+kyXY/XtEh8+NMm4nIng== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 17 September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Just add a per-sb mutex inside the filesystem. Given that lock_super > isn't used by the VFS anymore that's actually equivalent. Ok, thanks for the hint. I'll fix that for isofs. Arnd