From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:12:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100920121232.GA9931@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100920091425.GA8381@ff.dom.local>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:14:25AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:02:00AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le lundi 20 septembre 2010 ?? 07:21 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> > > Btw, I wonder what is the exact reason we can't use only
> > > NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET?
> >
> > I see no real reason.
> >
> > On 32bit arches, it might be faster to manipulate pointers, and not
> > 'base+offset' values.
>
> The only reason is code readability and maintenance. Did anybody check
> how much faster?
Hmm... I probably misread your reasoning. So, if no real reason,
really, how about turning this NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET on
unconditionally in net-next, until somebody spots the difference?
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-03 3:43 [PATCH] net: Frag list lost on head expansion David Miller
2010-09-03 5:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 6:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 9:09 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 13:46 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 2:20 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 5:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 5:05 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 9:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-07 9:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-10 19:54 ` David Miller
2010-09-11 12:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 3:30 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 10:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 10:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 15:58 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 16:13 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 22:08 ` David Miller
2010-09-13 7:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 19:55 ` Ben Pfaff
2010-09-12 20:24 ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 0:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-20 7:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 9:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 9:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 12:12 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-20 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 16:59 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 1:25 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-22 19:12 [PATCH] Fix corruption of skb csum field in pskb_expand_head() of net/core/skbuff.c Andrea Shepard
2010-07-23 5:09 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization Eric Dumazet
2010-07-25 4:06 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100920121232.GA9931@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.