From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:55:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from localhost user: 'ralf' uid#500 fake: STDIN
        (ralf@eddie.linux-mips.org)) by eddie.linux-mips.org
        id S1491827Ab0ITNzt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
        Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:55:49 +0200
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:55:48 +0100
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To:     Philby John <pjohn@mvista.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix syscall 64 bit number comments
Message-ID: <20100920135548.GC15938@linux-mips.org>
References: <1284988804.4442.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1284988804.4442.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
X-archive-position: 27775
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips
Return-Path: <linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org>
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 15317

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:50:04PM +0530, Philby John wrote:

You've posted a minute too early - David's latest patch which I applied
adds another wrong syscall number comment.  I'll fix that up.

  Ralf