From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756593Ab0ITOnJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:43:09 -0400
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:42197 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751893Ab0ITOnH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:43:07 -0400
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:41:26 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@gmail.com>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.6-stable.git abandoned?
Message-ID: <20100920144126.GC24083@kroah.com>
References: <158DE6B2-4FA4-4213-A63F-76BC94D539D9@googlemail.com>
 <20100920071800.49ef5e19@bike.lwn.net>
 <201009201535.09341.stefan.roese@gmail.com>
 <20100920073806.32e174f4@bike.lwn.net>
 <20100920135257.GB5349@kryptos.osrc.amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100920135257.GB5349@kryptos.osrc.amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Date: Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:38:06AM -0600
> 
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:35:08 +0200
> > Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hmmm, looking at:
> > > 
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git;a=summary
> > > 
> > > The last change went 3 weeks ago into this git repository.
> > 
> > Try:
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.34.y.git
> > 
> > if you want 2.6.34 updates.
> 
> Actually, I use the first repo above for stable updates too because it
> conveniently contains all 2.6.3x releases. Isn't that one the official
> combined repo for stable updates? Can we have some clarification from
> the -stable team on which repo we should take?

The "combined" tree is automagically generated by some script on
kernel.org and I have no control over it at all, sorry.  If it's not
working properly, poke the kernel.org admins.

I use the individual kernel trees for all of the "development" of the
stable releases, so you can be sure that those work as they are the ones
needed to generate the release.

hope this helps,

greg k-h