From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= <david@hardeman.nu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: enable AVI infoframe for intel_hdmi.c
	[v2]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:01:06 +0200
Message-ID: <20100920220106.GA18238@hardeman.nu>
References: <20100909210001.11985.1244.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
	<8u3s8d$jhdi8u@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from palpatine.hardeman.nu (1-1-12-13a.han.sth.bostream.se
	[82.182.30.168])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD6D9E763
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8u3s8d$jhdi8u@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jesse.barnes@intel.com
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:00:01 +0200, David H=E4rdeman <david@hardeman.nu> =
wrote:
> > This is the second version which merges the infoframe code from
> > intel_hdmi.c and intel_sdvo.c, I hope this is something along the lines
> > Chris Wilson had in mind. Note that I'm assuming that the sdvo hardware
> > also stores a header ECC byte in the MSB of the first dword (haven't fo=
und
> > any documentation for the sdvo).
> =

> drm-intel-next has changed slightly since you wrote the patch, so can =

> you
> respin it - just a couple of the macro names have changed to be
> consistent.

I based my patch on this:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel.git;a=3Dshortl=
og;h=3Ddrm-intel-next

And I'm not seeing any such changes...am I using the wrong tree/branch?

-- =

David H=E4rdeman