From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755148Ab0IVPHy (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:07:54 -0400 Received: from tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.54]:40514 "EHLO tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755101Ab0IVPHw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:07:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAL63mUxGGN6i/2dsb2JhbACiLnLEGIVBBI8w Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:02:50 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Andi Kleen Cc: jbaron@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.co.au, rostedt@goodmis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, roland@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, vgoyal@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org, tony@bakeyournoodle.com, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rewrite jump_label.c to use binary search Message-ID: <20100922150250.GB4897@Krystal> References: <1285150102-5506-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1285150102-5506-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20100922113114.GA14179@Krystal> <4a8f3ad8416ed61cba1746883da1f839.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> <589c3dd38437c80704d8224523efbccc.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <589c3dd38437c80704d8224523efbccc.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.27.31-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 11:01:29 up 168 days, 52 min, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.12, 0.09 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen (andi@firstfloor.org) wrote: > > > > >>> + for (; entry < stop && entry->key == key; entry++) > >>> + if (kernel_text_address(entry->code)) > >> > >> This does not work for modules I'm afraid, only for the core kernel. You > >> should test for __module_text_address() somewhere. > > > > I thought it was shared now, but ok. > > Double checked. This is ok because kernel_text_address() > already checks for modules. You were probably thinking > of __kernel_text_address() Ah right, Although we have another problem: __module_text_address() includes module init text, which defeats the purpose of the check put in there by Jason. So the check works for the core kernel, but not for modules. Mathieu > > -Andi > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com