From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>,
x86@kernel.org, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, HPET: ignore any PCI BARs that match an HPET we already know about
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:15:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922201547.3197.33702.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
We often discover the HPET early, via the static ACPI HPET table, before
enumerating PCI devices. If the HPET is implemented as a PCI function,
we will discover it again during PCI device enumeration. We must ignore
the PCI function so we don't inadvertently move it out from under the
driver.
I think it's better to ignore *any* PCI BAR that matches a previously
discovered HPET; that way we don't need platform-specific knowledge,
and we won't have to add more quirks for future machines.
This is for a regression from 2.6.34, but the reporter has been
unable to test it yet.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18482
Reported-by: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/pci/fixup.c | 28 ----------------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
index 939b9e9..99a7d4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
@@ -507,6 +507,27 @@ static void force_disable_hpet_msi(struct pci_dev *unused)
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS,
force_disable_hpet_msi);
+static void disable_pci_hpet(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (!hpet_address)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
+ struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
+
+ if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_MEM &&
+ res->start == hpet_address) {
+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: %pR is an HPET we found earlier; ignoring this BAR\n",
+ i, res);
+ res->flags = 0;
+ res->start = 0;
+ res->end = 0;
+ }
+ }
+}
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, disable_pci_hpet);
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_PCI) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
index 6dd8955..08eba69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
@@ -493,31 +493,3 @@ static void __devinit pci_siemens_interrupt_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SIEMENS, 0x0015,
pci_siemens_interrupt_controller);
-
-/*
- * SB600: Disable BAR1 on device 14.0 to avoid HPET resources from
- * confusing the PCI engine:
- */
-static void sb600_disable_hpet_bar(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
- u8 val;
-
- /*
- * The SB600 and SB700 both share the same device
- * ID, but the PM register 0x55 does something different
- * for the SB700, so make sure we are dealing with the
- * SB600 before touching the bit:
- */
-
- pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x08, &val);
-
- if (val < 0x2F) {
- outb(0x55, 0xCD6);
- val = inb(0xCD7);
-
- /* Set bit 7 in PM register 0x55 */
- outb(0x55, 0xCD6);
- outb(val | 0x80, 0xCD7);
- }
-}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4385, sb600_disable_hpet_bar);
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-22 20:15 Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2010-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH] x86, HPET: ignore any PCI BARs that match an HPET we already know about Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-22 20:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-22 20:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-22 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-22 22:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-22 22:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-22 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-22 22:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-22 21:22 ` [tip:x86/pci] x86, pci: Ignore " tip-bot for Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-22 21:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-22 22:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-22 22:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-23 22:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922201547.3197.33702.stgit@bob.kio \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcj303@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.