From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing, perf: add more power related events Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:34:07 +0200 Message-ID: <201009222034.08706.trenn@suse.de> References: <201009221957.57845.trenn@suse.de> <4C9A473F.1060301@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56583 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754426Ab0IVSei (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:34:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C9A473F.1060301@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jean Pihet , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Len Brown , arjan@infradead.org, Kevin Hilman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 22 September 2010 20:13:19 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 9/22/2010 10:57 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > On Wed > >> unfortunately this code is changing a userspace ABI... we really > >> shouldn't do that if we can avoid it, > >> and here we can avoid it. > > [do you really need to get personal?] Is that personal already? But discussing details makes more sense and I have to appologize for the needless comment. > (but I've been traveling too much in the last few weeks and have been > rather overwhelmed in mail as a result) Yes, time is short. Sorry about that one. And thanks for your input, even your time is probably shorter than mine, Thomas