From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Oyl2u-0001NS-Ek for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:37:05 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:37:02 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fl=E1vio?= Silveira Subject: Re: [Help] SST39VF6401B Support Message-ID: <20100923123701.GE2994@pengutronix.de> References: <74A5BE60138147F696E151AACD52EDEE@THOR> <20100923120534.GD2994@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Yegor Yefremov List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Thanks for your response. What do you mean by broken CFI? Well, ehrm, it is broken :) It simply doesn't work the way it is expected, due to the custom unlock address. > Also, as you seem with way more experience than me, do you know if > cfi_probe do 3 cycle command for SST CFI Query Entry? > If you could check: http://www.sst.com/dotAsset/40483.pdf > Give me your thoughts about it Sorry, besides my initial pointer, I have too many other things going on today. But it seems Guillaume had a look and will guide you. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkybSe0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRvwOgCgkNF+YvVN9PujrgzVHRUeoxNL lFAAoJOwofXl6NBe3ZP5yTbE+RoARdKO =N8zd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y--