All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] hfsplus: use alloc_mutex in hfsplus_sync_fs
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:20:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100926212034.GE6394@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100926211920.GA6394@lst.de>

Use alloc_mutex to protect hfsplus_sync_fs against itself and concurrent
allocations, which allows to get rid of lock_super in hfsplus.

Note that most fields in the superblock still aren't protected against
concurrent allocations, that will follow later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/hfsplus/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/hfsplus/super.c	2010-09-27 05:25:07.450327791 +0900
+++ linux-2.6/fs/hfsplus/super.c	2010-09-27 05:26:11.439327789 +0900
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int hfsplus_sync_fs(struct super_block *
 
 	dprint(DBG_SUPER, "hfsplus_write_super\n");
 
-	lock_super(sb);
+	mutex_lock(&HFSPLUS_SB(sb).alloc_mutex);
 	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 
 	vhdr->free_blocks = cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_SB(sb).free_blocks);
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ int hfsplus_sync_fs(struct super_block *
 		}
 		HFSPLUS_SB(sb).flags &= ~HFSPLUS_SB_WRITEBACKUP;
 	}
-	unlock_super(sb);
+	mutex_unlock(&HFSPLUS_SB(sb).alloc_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-26 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-26 21:19 [PATCH 1/6] hfsplus: fix BKL leak in hfsplus_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] hfsplus: split hfsplus_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] hfsplus: protect setflags using i_mutex Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] hfsplus: introduce alloc_mutex Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] hfsplus: remove BKL from hfsplus_put_super Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100926212034.GE6394@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.