From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 07/12] gitweb: remotes view for a single remote
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:55:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009262255.45959.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285344167-8518-8-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> If the hash parameter is passed to gitweb, remotes will interpret it as
> the name of a remote and limit the view the the heads of that remote.
Errr... I think this commit message needs rewriting to be more clear.
Perhaps:
When 'remotes' view is passed 'hash' parameter, it would interprete it
as the name of a remote ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
> ---
> gitweb/gitweb.perl | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> index 76cf806..7c62701 100755
> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> @@ -5547,13 +5547,28 @@ sub git_remotes {
> or die_error(403, "Remote heads view is disabled");
>
> my $head = git_get_head_hash($project);
> - git_header_html();
> - git_print_page_nav('','', $head,undef,$head,format_ref_views('remotes'));
> + my $remote = $input_params{'hash'};
I am not sure about using 'hash' parameter for that.
On one hand it is a hack that allow us to not worry about adding extra
code to evaluate_path_info() subroutine, so that natural path_info URL
of http://git.example.com/repo.git/remotes/<remote> would use <remote>
as name of remote to limit to.
On the other hand it is abusing semantic of 'hash' parameter. Remote
name is not revision name or object id.
What makes this issue stronger is the fact that URL is part of API,
and if we make mistake here, we would have to maintain backward
compatibility (at least if it appears in a released version).
> +
> + git_header_html(undef, undef, 'header_extra' => $remote);
I don't quite like the name of this parameter, and I am not sure
if I like the API either.
> + git_print_page_nav('', '', $head, undef, $head,
> + format_ref_views($remote ? '' : 'remotes'));
Why this change?
> git_print_header_div('summary', $project);
>
> - my @remotelist = git_get_heads_list(undef, 'remotes');
> - if (@remotelist) {
> - git_heads_body(\@remotelist, $head);
> + if (defined $remote) {
> + # only display the heads in a given remote
> + my @headslist = map {
> + my $ref = $_ ;
> + $ref->{'name'} =~ s!^$remote/!!;
> + $ref
> + } git_get_heads_list(undef, "remotes/$remote");
Hmmm... do we need this temporary variable? Does it make anything
more clear?
> + if (@headslist) {
> + git_heads_body(\@headslist, $head);
> + }
This part is the same (modulo name of variable) in both branches of this
conditional.
> + } else {
> + my @remotelist = git_get_heads_list(undef, 'remotes');
> + if (@remotelist) {
> + git_heads_body(\@remotelist, $head);
> + }
> }
> git_footer_html();
> }
> --
> 1.7.3.68.g6ec8
>
>
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-26 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 16:02 [PATCHv5 00/12] gitweb: remote_heads feature Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 01/12] gitweb: introduce " Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 17:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-26 19:19 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-26 19:47 ` David Ripton
2010-09-27 6:42 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 02/12] gitweb: git_get_heads_list accepts an optional list of refs Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 17:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 03/12] gitweb: separate heads and remotes lists Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 17:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 04/12] gitweb: nagivation menu for tags, heads and remotes Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 17:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 6:48 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-27 8:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 05/12] gitweb: use fullname as hash_base in heads link Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 17:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 06/12] gitweb: allow extra text after action in page header Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 18:11 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 6:56 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-27 7:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 07/12] gitweb: remotes view for a single remote Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 20:55 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-09-27 7:11 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-27 7:53 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 08/12] gitweb: auxiliary function to group data Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 21:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 7:26 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-27 8:12 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 19:17 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 09/12] gitweb: group styling Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 22:10 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 7:27 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 10/12] gitweb: git_repo_url() routine Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 22:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-27 7:29 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 11/12] gitweb: use git_repo_url() in summary Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 22:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-24 16:02 ` [PATCHv5 12/12] gitweb: gather more remote data Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-27 15:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-10-23 16:17 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-09-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv5 00/12] gitweb: remote_heads feature Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009262255.45959.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.