From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf: Wrap perf_lock_task_context using __cond_lock()
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927134641.GA5456@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285583997-1262-2-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 07:39:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> perf_lock_task_context() conditionally grabs ctx->lock in case of
> returning non-NULL. Rename and wrap it using __cond_lock to make
> sparse happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/perf_event.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index db5b560..c058a42 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static u64 primary_event_id(struct perf_event *event)
> * the context could get moved to another task.
> */
> static struct perf_event_context *
> -perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> +__perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> {
> struct perf_event_context *ctx;
>
> @@ -184,6 +184,14 @@ perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> return ctx;
> }
>
> +static inline struct perf_event_context *
> +perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_context *ctx;
> + __cond_lock(&ctx->lock, ctx = __perf_lock_task_context(task, flags));
> + return ctx;
> +}
That's a pity we need to make the code less readable just to make a tool
happy.
How do functions like mutex_lock_interruptible() that may
or may not lock? I don't see __cond_lock adds there.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-27 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 10:39 [PATCH 0/5] perf cleanups Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf: Wrap perf_lock_task_context using __cond_lock() Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 13:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-09-27 14:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2010-09-30 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf: Annotate lock context on perf_output_begin/end() Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: Remove 'extern' on hw_perf_event_init() definition Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf: Make perf_event_wakeup() static Namhyung Kim
2010-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf: Declare hw_perf_{dis,en}able() in perf_event.h Namhyung Kim
2010-09-30 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-30 15:05 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100927134641.GA5456@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.