From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis R. Rodriguez Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:25:02 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [internal-ath9k-devel] PCI device 168c:ff1c ("AR5008", possibly Apple-branded) In-Reply-To: <20100927200839.GB2933263@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> References: <20100926133935.GA2405354@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> <93781E992CBA7843962D8B0E7D683F3C15C6EE4E9C@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> <20100927195402.GA2933263@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> <20100927200839.GB2933263@jupiter.n2.diac24.net> Message-ID: <20100927202502.GJ2429@tux> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:08:39PM -0700, David Lamparter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:58:30PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > address test failed addr: 0x00008000 - wr:0xaaaaaaaa != rd:0xaaaaaaab > > > > could be busted card, does the card work with another OS? If so when > > did you last try? > > I don't have any other OS at my disposal currently; if I can't get it to > work I will ask around if I find someone with a Mini-PCIe slot and > Windows / Mac OS X. My guess so far based on your debug logs is the card is bust. > > If the chip test fails, better not keep trying. > > I've disabled it because it already was disabled for the 9271, so I > guessed my card might need the same workaround. > > The chip test also checks various revision values, could it be that it > is assuming the wrong revision for this card? chip tests runs prior to eeprom checksum, my guess is the eeprom checksum will fail too and your card is just bust. Luis