From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: Jagadish Nadimpalli <jagadish.nadimpalli@oneconvergence.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:01:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100928110151.GC2804@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=uDMxCD7Y93Jf+Ba+-gv2dAKBQhPn+1_Ck+T_6@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 03:58:50PM +0530, Jagadish Nadimpalli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With latest PV-on-HVM branch 2.6.35-rc5-pvhvm-v7, the network performance
> results(Using netperf -H <IP address of netserver> -l 100) range from
> 700Mbps to 730Mbps. Please note that this is similar to the old branch
> 2.6.34-pvhvm. One difference is that the latest branch is much more
> stable. The old branch code used to freeze a lot.
>
These benchmark results are still on a non-EPT CPU?
-- Pasi
> Thanks & Regards,
> Jagadish
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Jagadish Nadimpalli
> <[1]jagadish.nadimpalli@oneconvergence.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Thanks a lot for your responses.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Jagadish
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> <[2]stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Jagadish Nadimpalli wrote:
> > Did anybody calculate benchmark network performance numbers for
> PV-on-HVM so that I can compare? The link provided by you
> > has some numbers as follows. This don't has the data rate that is
> transferred via a network interface.
> >
> > Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
> > Elapsed Time 215.307 (10.1294)
> > User Time 632.503 (6.4785)
> > System Time 115.497 (4.53905)
> > Percent CPU 347.333 (15.885)
> > Context Switches 43319.7 (2088.39)
> >
> > Sleeps 48950 (3140.18)
> >
>
> I don't think anyone did so far.
>
> > ??
> > ??
> > I verified the "xm dmesg" and there is no print of "Extended Page
> Tables (EPT)". Does this mean that the extended page
> > table support is not there? Can I enable this through BIOS option?
> If it can't be enabled using BIOS option, could you
> > please let me know the Intel chipset series which has this support.
> >
> >
>
> I don't think that EPT can be enable/disable via BIOS, probably your
> cpu doesn't support it.
> The first Intel cpu series to support EPT is Nehalem:
>
> [3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_%28microarchitecture%29
>
> all the new desktops and servers sold today should have ept support,
> you
> can check on the intel website to be sure.
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:jagadish.nadimpalli@oneconvergence.com
> 2. mailto:stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
> 3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_%28microarchitecture%29
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-25 6:24 Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-27 10:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-09-27 11:27 ` Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-27 11:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-09-27 12:42 ` Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-27 13:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-09-27 15:48 ` Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-28 10:28 ` Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-28 11:01 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
2010-09-28 11:28 ` Jagadish Nadimpalli
2010-09-28 22:17 ` Christian Zoffoli
2010-09-29 9:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-09-30 18:56 ` Christian Zoffoli
2010-10-01 6:00 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-10-01 13:19 ` Christian Zoffoli
2010-10-01 13:42 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-10-01 14:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-01 14:13 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-10-01 14:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-01 22:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-04 17:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-04 17:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-04 19:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-01 15:10 ` Christian Zoffoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100928110151.GC2804@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=jagadish.nadimpalli@oneconvergence.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.