diff for duplicates of <20100928120000.GA7139@ericsson.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 935803f..32eae9c 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ if that is not possible.
 > evidences that it doesn't work properly? This trick come from Intel
 > themselves, I would guess they know their business.
 > 
-From a technical perspective. Hard to see what a PCI bridge ID has to do with Tjmax.
+>From a technical perspective. Hard to see what a PCI bridge ID has to do with Tjmax.
 
 > > So at least in this case it would make sense for me to remove
 > > the dependency completely. Actually, we won't even change functionality,
@@ -71,8 +71,3 @@ I would definitely prefer that over disabling coretemp entirely just because it
 possibly report a wrong Tjmax (which it doees anyway for many CPUs).
 
 Guenter
-
-_______________________________________________
-lm-sensors mailing list
-lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
-http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 8f4f686..c7cc563 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
  "ref\020100927130220.GA2277@ericsson.com\0"
  "ref\020100928091759.421b5bf2@endymion.delvare\0"
  "From\0Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] x86/hwmon: conditionalize coretemp's dependency on\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:00:00 +0000\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: x86/hwmon: conditionalize coretemp's dependency on PCI\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:00:00 -0700\0"
  "To\0Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>"
   r.marek@assembler.cz <r.marek@assembler.cz>
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
  "> evidences that it doesn't work properly? This trick come from Intel\n"
  "> themselves, I would guess they know their business.\n"
  "> \n"
- "From a technical perspective. Hard to see what a PCI bridge ID has to do with Tjmax.\n"
+ ">From a technical perspective. Hard to see what a PCI bridge ID has to do with Tjmax.\n"
  "\n"
  "> > So at least in this case it would make sense for me to remove\n"
  "> > the dependency completely. Actually, we won't even change functionality,\n"
@@ -88,11 +88,6 @@
  "I would definitely prefer that over disabling coretemp entirely just because it _might_\n"
  "possibly report a wrong Tjmax (which it doees anyway for many CPUs).\n"
  "\n"
- "Guenter\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
- "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
- http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
+ Guenter
 
-4a964322cbd16fecf9962e31c555511bdba8d5e1e4070c08f1354f59cdc6c15e
+1e9147ca4aad2e8a43e4209080fc57bdfd36a7690df3467d53986aefd08370aa
