From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:15:39 -0700
Subject: [ath9k-devel] A bad case of resetting the chip
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsc062eCBKk+nW=BuzoqWeSstFU+OKN4sCkqQU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=qhcjKZR48e8HDwuqsJY=NcmzKtKeG5K6OXreG@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100928181541.GD2291@tux>
	<AANLkTinsc062eCBKk+nW=BuzoqWeSstFU+OKN4sCkqQU@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100928201539.GA1939@tux>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:14:36PM -0700, Bj?rn Smedman wrote:
> 2010/9/28 Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:35:28AM -0700, Bj?rn Smedman wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I recently updated some AR913x based routers (with AR9100 MAC/BB Rev:0
> >> AR2133 RF Rev:a2) with ath9k from compat-wireless-2010-07-29.
> >
> > That 3 months old now, try upgrading and see if you see the same issues.
> 
> When I've finally found a snapshot that has stood up to 3 months of
> testing I'm not very keen on upgrading to a later one (I have tried
> some but they are broken in other ways).
> 
> Is there a stable branch that you can recommend?

If you want stability you should focus on using the releases
based on the stable kernels:

http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable/

  Luis