From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: no cycles for certain xentrace entries Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20100930144706.GA1948@aepfle.de> References: <20100831184458.GA24018@aepfle.de> <20100929080929.GA24421@aepfle.de> <20100930141845.GA1772@aepfle.de> <4CA49CFA.9080408@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA49CFA.9080408@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: George Dunlap Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Sep 30, George Dunlap wrote: > Thanks for the patch; I'll take a look and apply what I can. What > version of gcc / what flags are you using? gcc 4.3.4 from SLES11 SP1. gcc -O2 -fmessage-length=0 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -Werror -o xenalyze xenalyze.c Olaf