From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sunrpc: Create sockets in namespaces
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:05:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101001220546.GG1472@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F11D1388-D48E-48F5-9711-79960B397FBF@oracle.com>
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:16:03AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:46 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> >>> Shall I commit this to my for-2.6.37 tree? Objections?
> >>
> >> I think it looks OK.
> >>
> >> But I was wondering if there were any other changes needed for the RDMA
> >> transport capability, or had we decided that would happen at a latter point,
> >> or that changes are entirely unneeded
> >
> > We definitely need more changes in the RDMA transport, but I would like to
> > have it done later (unless someone other than me starts doing it earlier ;) ).
>
> OK, thanks for clearing that up. It makes sense to keep the scope of this socket patch set narrow, but I don't want the RDMA pieces to get lost. The more we let the RDMA and socket transport capabilities differ, the harder it will be to support RDMA in the long run.
>
> Anyway, Bruce, I have no objection to the latest version of this socket patch set, fwiw.
Applied and pushed out, thanks Pavel and Chuck....
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-01 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 12:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] sunrpc: Create sockets in namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] sunrpc: Factor out rpc_xprt allocation Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] sunrpc: Factor out rpc_xprt freeing Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] sunrpc: Add net argument to svc_create_xprt Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] sunrpc: Pull net argument downto svc_create_socket Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] sunrpc: Add net to rpc_create_args Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] sunrpc: Add net to xprt_create Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] sunrpc: Tag rpc_xprt with net Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] net: Export __sock_create Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 12:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] sunrpc: Create sockets in net namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-29 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] sunrpc: Create sockets in namespaces J. Bruce Fields
2010-09-29 21:49 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-30 5:46 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2010-09-30 15:16 ` Chuck Lever
2010-09-30 15:34 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2010-10-01 22:05 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-07-20 21:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-07-21 7:50 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2011-07-21 16:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101001220546.GG1472@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.