From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 1 (staging/olpc_dcon) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:51:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20101002185154.GA18020@suse.de> References: <20101001153756.47b52566.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101001154531.997630a2.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20101001192454.0a427cb0@debxo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56682 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751412Ab0JBSyQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:54:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101001192454.0a427cb0@debxo> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andres Salomon Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , driverdevel , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Chris Ball , Jon Nettleton On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:24:54PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:45:31 -0700 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:37:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20100930: > > > > > > drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c:57: error: implicit > > declaration of function 'geode_gpio_event_irq' > > drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c:57: error: implicit > > declaration of function 'geode_gpio' > > Yep, it's pending a cs5535-gpio patch > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/209482/). Wait, as I didn't apply the later patches, what I did apply should have still built properly (remember our rule, no breakage at any point in a patch series.) So, should I revert the last olpc patch that caused this problem? thanks, greg k-h