All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: Jonathan Guerin <jonathan@guerin.id.au>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can 'iw' show the current tx-power?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:07:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010041107.46117.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikMHVauosiqRbOw1Dp8JuFS2tpXYd-Hcps_SbPD@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon October 4 2010 10:46:45 you wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org> wrote:
> > On Mon October 4 2010 10:27:47 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> > 
> > wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> >> >> On 10/02/2010 08:21 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 21:37 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> >> >> >> It seems it can set it, but I don't see any command to print out
> >> >> >> the current value?
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> Ben
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > This is pretty much last missing feature from iw.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Maybe that and current operating transfer rate?  I can't
> >> >> seem to find that anywhere other than 'iwconfig'...
> >> > 
> >> > iw wlan0 link shows that.
> >> 
> >> This does not work in adhoc mode:
> >> 
> >> # iw dev wlan0 info
> >> Interface wlan0
> >>         ifindex 4
> >>         type IBSS
> >> 
> >> # iw dev wlan0 link
> >> Not connected.
> > 
> > the TX rate is different for each station (and basically for each
> > individual packet too) so it does not make sense to show that for the
> > "link" (what ever "link" may mean in the context of ad-hoc...).
> > 
> > iw wlan0 station dump
> > 
> > can show you the last TX rate for each station, but again, the rate can
> > and will change on a per-packet basis.
> > 
> > there is no such thing as a "current transfer rate".
> 
> With iwconfig, we can set a fixed rate, shouldn't this be what we
> expect to see as the 'rate'?

it only makes sense if you set a single fixed rate.

> Speaking of, is there a particular reason why we still have to use
> iwconfig to set the rate as well?

a TX bitrate mask has been added to iw in version 0.9.21:

commit 0db5d893ecf2ce4538af6fdcae3d94f2f83757e2                                         
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>                                       
Date:   Fri Sep 24 17:44:07 2010 +0200                                                  
                                                                                        
    version 0.9.21                                                                      
                                                                                        
     * transmit power support                                                           
     * TX bitrate mask support                                                          
     * more informative scan output                                                     
     * make it build on old systems                                                                

you can use it like this, e.g.: "iw wlan0 set bitrates legacy-2.4 12 18 24"

this is much more flexible than the iwconfig way, as it allows a bitmap of TX 
rates which can be used. again this is a reason why it does not make sense to 
show a single TX bitrate, but i guess this TX bitmap could/should be shown 
somewhere.

bruno

      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-04  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-02  4:37 Can 'iw' show the current tx-power? Ben Greear
2010-10-02 15:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-10-02 17:23   ` Ben Greear
2010-10-02 18:48     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-10-04  1:27       ` Jonathan Guerin
2010-10-04  1:43         ` Bruno Randolf
2010-10-04  1:46           ` Jonathan Guerin
2010-10-04  2:07             ` Bruno Randolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201010041107.46117.br1@einfach.org \
    --to=br1@einfach.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=jonathan@guerin.id.au \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.