From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 5 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:50:26 +0200 Message-ID: <201010051050.26543.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20101005161220.0bef433f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101005194232.de733b2b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:57181 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753317Ab0JEIug (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:50:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101005194232.de733b2b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Zimny Lech , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:38:49 +0200 Zimny Lech wrote: > > > > Also, I saw this > > /home/test/linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h:1274:20: warning: function > > declaration isn't a prototype > > /home/test/linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h:1278:20: warning: function > > declaration isn't a prototype > > > > It was fixed in -mmotm by Valdis Kletnieks. > > Yeah, it was fixed in linux-next, but rebroken by a rebase of the bkl-vfs > tree since yesterday. Ok, fixed it again now. Sorry for messing this up twice. Arnd