From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>) id 1P38ex-0000J0-2X
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:38:27 +0200
Received: from guest190.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de ([134.169.35.190] helo=excalibur.local)
	by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa 
	(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1)
	id 1P38ee-0004TX-1T by authid <stefan@sostec.de> with cram_md5
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:38:10 +0200
Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <stefan@excalibur.local>) id 1P383z-0005X9-2U
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:00:15 +0200
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:00:14 +0200
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Message-ID: <20101005140014.GF3517@excalibur.local>
References: <AANLkTikzKs+3U0JfEbQxg5dLVuMF51To2qTn55YLOmjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101005123257.GD3517@excalibur.local>
	<AANLkTikaunRh8wSWihAN3C9xh++YBH2qZT8Tr_xdxVF-@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikaunRh8wSWihAN3C9xh++YBH2qZT8Tr_xdxVF-@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/
X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665
X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org)
Subject: Re: testing 2010-10-04
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:38:27 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello.

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:23, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 
> Personally I would prefer it if the testing branch could be made on friday.
> That way I (and I guess others) can use unused CPU cycles @ work
> during the weekend to do the test builds.
> How do others feel about that?

I think it makes sense. I normally do the build directly after the new testing
branch gets created and doing that at a weekend would be good from my view. Put
monday is not that bad either.

Cliff, for now you have done all the branch creating and tagging, etc. Thanks
for that. If you need help or some weeks relaxing from the monotone tasks let us
know.

regards
Stefan Schmidt