From: amit.kucheria@linaro.org (Amit Kucheria)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:40:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101007074044.GG2457@matterhorn.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=fh4_19QhB8ArTfiigbPOQSejB=gLPMiEmyXjP@mail.gmail.com>
On 10 Oct 07, Yong Shen wrote:
>
> > > +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table imx_freq_table[4];
> >
> > Three frequencies should be enough for everyone, right? This should be
> > dynamically allocated like in other cpufreq drivers.
> >
>
> Yes, we only support 3 work points, which is for sure. Actually, we only
> support 2 points on most mx51 chips. I supposed it is ok to use static array
> here.
This can become a common cpufreq driver for all i.MX platforms. We don't know
how many work points will be supported in future versions of the silicon.
That is why a static array is not ok.
I think Sascha was being ironic when he said "Three frequencies should be
enough for everyone, right?" :)
/Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1285738417-1638-1-git-send-email-yong.shen@linaro.org>
2010-09-30 10:48 ` [PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51 Amit Kucheria
2010-10-01 4:06 ` Yong Shen
2010-10-04 7:43 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-10-06 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-10-07 3:36 ` Yong Shen
2010-10-07 7:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-10-07 12:00 ` Yong Shen
2010-10-12 7:11 ` [PATCHv2] " Yong Shen
2010-10-07 7:40 ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2010-10-07 7:50 ` [PATCH] " Sascha Hauer
2010-10-05 11:58 mx51 cpufreq driver yong.shen at linaro.org
2010-10-05 11:58 ` [PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51 yong.shen at linaro.org
2010-10-05 12:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-06 5:38 ` Yong Shen
2010-10-06 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-07 4:10 ` Yong Shen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-07 5:36 mx51 cpufreq driver yong.shen at linaro.org
2010-10-07 5:36 ` [PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51 yong.shen at linaro.org
2010-10-07 8:03 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-10-07 11:33 ` Yong Shen
2010-10-07 11:45 ` Amit Kucheria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101007074044.GG2457@matterhorn.lan \
--to=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.