From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andres Salomon Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:50:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Message-Id: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> List-Id: References: <20101010014358.30cb74b5@debxo> <20101010020905.1e27c1b4@debxo> <20101011040443.GA23588@angua.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Miller On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86 > > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree > > branch. > > Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one > of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time. > > 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c > > I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now > > 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86 > > I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I > cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this > earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I > needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds > OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I > merge it. > > g. Okay. For reference, that patch is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/ x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777Ab0JKGu1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:50:27 -0400 Received: from LUNGE.MIT.EDU ([18.54.1.69]:44537 "EHLO lunge.queued.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752638Ab0JKGu0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:50:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:50:15 -0700 From: Andres Salomon To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <20101010014358.30cb74b5@debxo> <20101010020905.1e27c1b4@debxo> <20101011040443.GA23588@angua.secretlab.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86 > > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree > > branch. > > Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one > of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time. > > 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c > > I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now > > 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86 > > I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I > cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this > earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I > needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds > OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I > merge it. > > g. Okay. For reference, that patch is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/ x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andres Salomon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:50:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo> References: <20101010014358.30cb74b5@debxo> <20101010020905.1e27c1b4@debxo> <20101011040443.GA23588@angua.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101011040443.GA23588-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Miller List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86 > > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree > > branch. > > Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one > of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time. > > 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c > > I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now > > 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86 > > I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I > cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this > earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I > needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds > OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I > merge it. > > g. Okay. For reference, that patch is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/ x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack?