From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:14:47 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Message-Id: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Richard Weinberger Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote: > This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux. I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ. What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756783Ab0JKWQX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:16:23 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47068 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756741Ab0JKWQX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:16:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:14:47 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Richard Weinberger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() Message-Id: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote: > This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux. I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ. What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?