Re: [PATCH] openjade: return oj-native-libosp-fix.patch, lost in BBCLASSEXTEND change fdf02c61607acb5046afaa11c5c682ab99f4d508

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Henning Heinold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:14:57PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > ---
> >  recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb |    5 +++--
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb b/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb
> > index 238586b..9462636 100644
> > --- a/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb
> > +++ b/recipes/openjade/openjade_1.3.2.bb
> > @@ -5,9 +5,10 @@ DESCRIPTION = "OpenJade is a suite of tools for validating, \
> >  processing, and applying DSSSL (Document Style Semantics and \
> >  Specification Language) stylesheets to SGML and XML documents."
> >  LICENSE = "BSD"
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >  SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/openjade/openjade-${PV}.tar.gz \
> > -	   file://configure.patch \
> > +           file://oj-native-libosp-fix.patch \
> > +           file://configure.patch \
> >            "
> >  
> >  inherit autotools
> 
> Didnt you forgot the oj-native-libosp-fix.patch or came it from an earlier version?

no, it was lost from SRC_URI  in previous patch (replacing openjade-native with
BBCLASSEXTEND), but file is still there and doesn't seem to do any harm
to non-native version as well (so applied to both now).

Regards,
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com