From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #20002] x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:27:43 +0200 Message-ID: <201010112227.43782.rjw@sisk.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Marc Aurele La France Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler On Monday, October 11, 2010, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20002 > > Subject : x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 > > Submitter : Marc Aurele La France > > Date : 2010-10-07 17:17 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128647187628706&w=2 > > Yes, this is still an issue. I'm still trying to track it down. I've > generated a series of 2.6.35-rc[1-6] kernels, which I will try tomorrow > (after today's statuatory holiday). Thanks for the update. Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756360Ab0JKU2i (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:28:38 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36132 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756200Ab0JKU2h (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:28:37 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Marc Aurele La France Subject: Re: [Bug #20002] x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:27:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-rc7-rjw+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010112227.43782.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, October 11, 2010, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20002 > > Subject : x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 > > Submitter : Marc Aurele La France > > Date : 2010-10-07 17:17 (4 days old) > > Message-ID : > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128647187628706&w=2 > > Yes, this is still an issue. I'm still trying to track it down. I've > generated a series of 2.6.35-rc[1-6] kernels, which I will try tomorrow > (after today's statuatory holiday). Thanks for the update. Rafael