From: Stefan Kisdaroczi <kisda@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai and PEAK can bus card problem
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:09:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010112309.22031.kisda@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB36116.8090507@domain.hid>
Am Montag 11 Oktober 2010, 21:10:14 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
> Peter Pastor wrote:
> > Hey Gilles,
> >
> > Thanks for the hint. I "fixed" this problem by loading the nvidia driver
> > (instead of nv) as default. Now the graphic cards uses IRQ 24 which does
> > not collide with IRQ 11 of the CAN bus card (see attached lspci.txt).
> >
> > The only other device that uses IRQ 11 is
> > # 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 5520 I/O Hub to ESI Port
> > [8086:3406] (rev 13)
> >
> > But I guess that is ok, is it ? I checked the FAQs and went through the
> > list but I feel I can't do much. I will try a few things and disable
> > everything that is unneeded. The FAQ list also suggests to enable
> > CONFIG_PCI_MSI which is disabled right now. What would now be a
> > reasonable thing to do ?
>
> Keep PCI_MSI disabled. The FAQ is wrong and should be fixed.
Hi Gilles and Jan,
what is wrong with PCI_MSI? In late june there was a discussion on this list
about irq-sharing [1]. Jan's statement at the end of the discussion:
> The better news is that modern hardware now more and more provides MSI,
> and that's an inherently unshared IRQ source.
We consider ordering custom built pcie boards (msi) to solve the irq-sharing
problem i have with my pci board. Bad idea ?
Stefan
[1] https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2010-06/msg00194.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-09 6:44 [Xenomai-help] Xenomai and PEAK can bus card problem Peter Pastor
2010-10-09 8:03 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-09 18:09 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-10 19:30 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-10 21:28 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-11 6:19 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-11 7:15 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-11 15:59 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-11 19:10 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-11 19:29 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-11 19:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-10-11 21:23 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-12 0:09 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-12 1:55 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-12 5:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-12 7:37 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-10-12 15:28 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-12 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-13 6:14 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-13 6:20 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-13 6:31 ` peter.pastor
2010-10-11 21:09 ` Stefan Kisdaroczi [this message]
2010-10-11 21:45 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-12 6:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-09 9:58 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010112309.22031.kisda@domain.hid \
--to=kisda@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.