From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5Qm9-0005uM-IY for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:23:21 +0000 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1P5Qm7-0001OK-Pr for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:23:21 +0000 From: Richard Weinberger Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:23:10 +0200 References: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010120023.10861.richard@nod.at> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Andrew Morton Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 00:14:47 schrieb Andrew Morton: > What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating > away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what? Yes. Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt: What: __do_IRQ all in one fits nothing interrupt handler When: 2.6.32 Why: __do_IRQ was kept for easy migration to the type flow handlers. More than two years of migration time is enough. Who: Thomas Gleixner Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756803Ab0JKWXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:23:16 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:34425 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756754Ab0JKWXP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:23:15 -0400 /m: From: Richard Weinberger To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:23:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.25.20-0.7-pae; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu References: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010120023.10861.richard@nod.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 00:14:47 schrieb Andrew Morton: > What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating > away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what? Yes. Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt: What: __do_IRQ all in one fits nothing interrupt handler When: 2.6.32 Why: __do_IRQ was kept for easy migration to the type flow handlers. More than two years of migration time is enough. Who: Thomas Gleixner Thanks, //richard