From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43224 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5h0h-0007N1-Uk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:43:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5h0g-0008Dc-55 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:43:27 -0400 Received: from hobi.com ([161.58.203.140]:47403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5h0g-0008D4-2Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:43:26 -0400 Received: from rick.localnet (adsl-99-40-178-1.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [99.40.178.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by hobi.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9CFhKbb025959 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:43:23 GMT From: Rick Vernam Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT] qemu 0.13.0-rc3 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:20 -0500 References: <4CB38C82.1090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4CB38C82.1090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010121043.20627.rickv@hobi.com> Reply-To: rickv@hobi.com List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I encountered two issues with 0.13.0-rc1, not sure how to tell if the patches have been applied? one is this patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/62420/ discussed here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-09/msg01114.html the other was http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-09/msg01165.html which was applied to seabios, but how can I determine if the shipped seabios includes this particular patch? Sorry for the noise... On Monday 11 October 2010 17:15:30 Anthony Liguori wrote: > After suffering from a prolonged maintainer softlockup, I'm attempting > to get 0.13.0 release process back on track. > > I've tagged qemu-0.13.0-rc3 in git which only carries a few changes > since 0.13.0-rc1. Most notably, a series of updates from Kevin Wolf and > Cam Macdonell's ivshmem device. > > I think we're pretty good testing wise for the final release but I > wanted to offer a 24-hour window for last minute fixes. I'm only > interested in the following: > > 1) Patches that are *tested* against the stable-0.13 branch that are > already committed in master. Please tell me explicitly that you've > tested the patch and how you've tested it. > > 2) Pull requests from other maintainers with cherry-picked patches > against stable-0.13 that have been tested. > > If you don't already have something ready, it's probably not worth > worrying about. We can follow with 0.13.1 in a relatively short period > of time. > > So please get any requests to me before 6PM US Central time October 12th. > > Post 0.13.0, as part of the 0.14 planning, we can discuss how to avoid > future delay with releases. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori