From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: S5P: Add EPLL rate change warning Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20101013080902.GA6424@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1286882399-27595-1-git-send-email-sw.youn@samsung.com> <1286883983-27790-1-git-send-email-sw.youn@samsung.com> <002301cb6aac$12a05e10$37e11a30$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688152432C for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002301cb6aac$12a05e10$37e11a30$%kim@samsung.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jassi.brar@samsung.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, 'Seungwhan Youn' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:55:55PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Seungwhan Youn wrote: > > This patch adds warning about changing EPLL rate to notice that other > > driver that controls H/W, which is using EPLL, will has unknown effects > > by this EPLL rate change. > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > > + clk->rate, rate); > Do we really need KERN_WARNING here? > How about just KERN_INFO?...In my opinion, to change EPLL value seems to be > nearer 'information' message more than 'warning'. Personally I don't think it really makes much odds so long as the message is displayed on the console by default. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: S5P: Add EPLL rate change warning In-Reply-To: <002301cb6aac$12a05e10$37e11a30$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1286882399-27595-1-git-send-email-sw.youn@samsung.com> <1286883983-27790-1-git-send-email-sw.youn@samsung.com> <002301cb6aac$12a05e10$37e11a30$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20101013080902.GA6424@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 04:55:55PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Seungwhan Youn wrote: > > This patch adds warning about changing EPLL rate to notice that other > > driver that controls H/W, which is using EPLL, will has unknown effects > > by this EPLL rate change. > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > > + clk->rate, rate); > Do we really need KERN_WARNING here? > How about just KERN_INFO?...In my opinion, to change EPLL value seems to be > nearer 'information' message more than 'warning'. Personally I don't think it really makes much odds so long as the message is displayed on the console by default.