From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Subject: Re: USB asynchronous mode feedback format Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:33:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20101014123322.GN7159@buzzloop.caiaq.de> References: <1287046026.4cb6c38a2a179@discus.singnet.com.sg> <201010141332.37735.julian@jusst.de> <20101014120641.GM10432@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <201010141430.43967.julian@jusst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from buzzloop.caiaq.de (buzzloop.caiaq.de [212.112.241.133]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92BC2414C for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:33:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010141430.43967.julian@jusst.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Julian Scheel Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lee188@singnet.com.sg List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:30:43PM +0200, Julian Scheel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 14:06:41 schrieb Daniel Mack: > > Yes, that looks suspicious, especially because it doesn't only affect > > the lower bits. What do you need this sample rate converter for, anyway? > > Can't you feed your signals directly to the DAC? FMT0 and FMT1 should > > both be set to 0. > > You mean OFMT0 and OFMT1? Imho they should be 1,0 for I2S. Or did you refer to > the DAC? In that case FMT0 and FMT1 both are set to 0. Jup, I was talking about the DAC. Daniel