From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101015124357.GC5969@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101012131828.5fedf1bf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On 11.10.10 22:18:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the oprofile tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/oprofile/common.c between commit
> 38a81da2205f94e8a2a834b51a6b99c91fc7c2e8 ("perf events: Clean up pid
> passing") from the tip tree and commit
> 3d90a00763b51e1db344a7430c966be723b67a29 ("oprofile: Abstract the
> perf-events backend") from the oprofile tree.
>
> The latter moved the code modified by the former, so I used the version
> of this file from the oprofile tree. I also applied the effect of the
> tip tree patch to the new file drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c:
Stephen,
I merged both trees and updated my oprofile for-next branch. They
should merge now without conflicts.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-15 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 2:18 linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-12 6:03 ` Matt Fleming
2010-10-12 12:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-12 12:51 ` Matt Fleming
2010-10-15 12:43 ` Robert Richter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-21 5:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-21 12:33 ` Robert Richter
2012-03-21 12:33 ` Robert Richter
2012-03-21 13:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-21 13:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13 6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-12 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-01 3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-01 13:21 ` Robert Richter
2010-10-01 13:21 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101015124357.GC5969@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.