From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:51012 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932413Ab0JOUMt (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:12:49 -0400 From: Christian Lamparter To: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.36-rc7] mac80211: cancel restart_work explicitly instead of depending on flush_scheduled_work() Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:07:31 +0200 Cc: "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg , Linux Wireless List , lkml References: <4CB874C0.8090003@kernel.org> <20101015192645.GA2438@tuxdriver.com> <4CB8AC80.7090802@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4CB8AC80.7090802@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201010152207.31553.chunkeey@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 15 October 2010 21:33:20 Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On 10/15/2010 09:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > >> wireless-testing/wireless-next has already such a patch: > >> "mac80211: cancel restart_work in ieee80211_unregister_hw" (2010-08-25) > >> > >> > >> > >> John, can you please push to 2.6.36-rc8? > >> (I know, I am _late_, but I didn't know about any potential problem > >> in the mainline?) > > > > I don't see how either patch would merit inclusion in 2.6.36 at this point. > > My patch definitely was aimed for 2.6.37-rc1 or later. Oh, so the "[PATCH v2.6.36-rc7]" in the patch subject was just "misleading" me. no-one could have known that there would be a 2.6.36-rc8 release. John, please ignore my previous request of pushing the patch into 2.6.36 ;). Regards, Chr