From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757170Ab0JQBN4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:13:56 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:46020 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757113Ab0JQBNz (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:13:55 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:13:50 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kyle McMartin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "H. Peter Anvin" , kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Mimi Zohar , warthog9@kernel.org, Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com Subject: Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory? Message-ID: <20101017011350.GA2838@infradead.org> References: <20101016065206.GO4681@dastard> <20101016192027.GA6883@infradead.org> <20101017004945.GE1614@infradead.org> <20101017010917.GB8332@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101017010917.GB8332@bombadil.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:09:17PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > The Kconfig description sounds generally useful to me. If it's bloated > crap, how did it get merged? Just like all the other crap. It's been made pretty clear that "no" generally is not an answer for a merge request. Just bikeshedding over whitespace or maintainer files entries for a couple month of delay is fine.