From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7kOg-00015A-Fu for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:44:44 +0200 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so380839bwz.6 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:44:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=A3nODOt7zCAGauwftotvt08hk5a66dWjc2If5l0UB4I=; b=Xf/GxEa83BHRBoRHPMsLHi5POJO9TRLmOk9NkjaGNZS4i4rdaC6NlRdrki8bM9pXTK ueq5qJNOpnfci3MzNBWy6/YXGkfoQFU3DqWMEJRFeP11jECag/ZrUxskXRvGfbNdXVTd iBaco1XjpMCkc5MTFDa5ZuAw3wobhx1ZG8Pi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=UxTwugv1jeQ67MiZNBLBQSfpSkjY/mKvZkAygsEuXF4F22G2Pq5SFgWkj2H4mduhYb 8k0qsQgwnchcIHWbAevo+MNd+g0Ml2vDq3suubLjh7oeO9uQ7w7FN35To9/cxIP8yzvw H5sAKdZgm3jAFShBmzOxAw/7KJwMc8P0me6YI= Received: by 10.204.126.167 with SMTP id c39mr4120789bks.125.1287387834639; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm14125182bkz.17.2010.10.18.00.43.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:43:47 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20101018074347.GE3324@jama> References: <20101017211540.GB3324@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] do we really need all OVERRIDES in FILESPATH? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:44:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:33:28AM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/10/17 Martin Jansa : > > Currently > > bitbake -e -b xserver-xorg-conf_0.1.bb | grep ^FILESPATH= | sed "s/:/\n/g" | wc -l > > shows 65 directories where file:// from SRC_URI can be found. > > Actually I got 84. This is git head from last friday or so. Seems a > good plan to reduce this somewhat. > BTW this was for: > DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" > MACHINE = "ixp4xxbe" Why do you have P and PN twice in FILESPATHPKG? something in local.conf? I don't see any in-tree conf/class changing FILESPATHPKG that way Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com