From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implements new features for updating existing device tree nodes. Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:06:51 +1100 Message-ID: <20101019010651.GG5512@yookeroo> References: <20101016010732.4855.52273.stgit@riker> <1287199277.4535.1423.camel@riker> <20101016064744.GD5036@yookeroo> <20101016081012.GH653@angua.secretlab.ca> <1287236747.4535.1424.camel@riker> <20101016183217.GA3774@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101018001135.GA4922@yookeroo> <20101018160115.GN19399@angua.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101018160115.GN19399-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:01:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: [snip] > It means only the /remove-node/ keyword needs to be defined. However, > it does mean that the syntax for full path references must be defined > immediately before it is useful. Actually, because of the way DT_REF is lexed, I believe &{/some/path} { prop = "new-value"; }; Will work already. Or do you mean implementing references to a label + relative path? -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson