From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: factor out common stuff Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:29:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20101019022950.GC3485@pengutronix.de> References: <1287138064-21385-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1287138064-21385-6-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20101018161355.GA21088@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:40168 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752682Ab0JSC3w (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:29:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101018161355.GA21088@void.printf.net> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Zhu Richard-R65037 --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, > > -#define ESDHC_HOST_CONTROL_RES 0x05 > > +#include "sdhci-esdhc.c" >=20 > Stephen reports a -next build failure after this patch. Presumably this > should be sdhci-esdhc.h? It's confusing that no-one else hit this. Uh, ouch, one brown paper bag, please! Yeah, confusing, that is. Regarding your patch: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky9Ap4ACgkQD27XaX1/VRu4lQCdGVyJZdXgjwTJyevmBhU2nSg/ saEAn3uBuWBOofTXy/bSs9xo+X6bwZKX =JkdO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:29:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: factor out common stuff In-Reply-To: <20101018161355.GA21088@void.printf.net> References: <1287138064-21385-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1287138064-21385-6-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20101018161355.GA21088@void.printf.net> Message-ID: <20101019022950.GC3485@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Chris, > > -#define ESDHC_HOST_CONTROL_RES 0x05 > > +#include "sdhci-esdhc.c" > > Stephen reports a -next build failure after this patch. Presumably this > should be sdhci-esdhc.h? It's confusing that no-one else hit this. Uh, ouch, one brown paper bag, please! Yeah, confusing, that is. Regarding your patch: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: