From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bandan Das Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make br_parse_ip_options static Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:22:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20101019112234.GB12005@stratus.com> References: <20101018170321.2b0de4ea@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mailhub.stratus.com ([134.111.1.18]:52495 "EHLO mailhub5.stratus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758363Ab0JSLXW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:23:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101018170321.2b0de4ea@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 0, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-10-18 17:01:36.903364885 -0700 > +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-10-18 17:01:48.106569141 -0700 > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static inline void nf_bridge_update_prot > * expected format > */ > > -int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk_buff *skb) > +static int br_parse_ip_options(struct sk_buff *skb) > { > struct ip_options *opt; > struct iphdr *iph; > My main motivation behind not making this static was that there would be possibly other places in the bridge code (besides br_netfilter.c) where we enter the IP stack and might want to call this. Not sure if it's indeed the case though.. -- Bandan