From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
Mingming Cao <mcao@us.ibm.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: Performance testing of various barrier reduction patches [was: Re: [RFC v4] ext4: Coordinate fsync requests]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:28:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019182817.GA11810@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101018224936.GI25624@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:49:36PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Through this table, I'm looking for a performance characteristic that typifies
> storage with a battery-backed write cache (BBWC). As we can see from
> lldd_flush_rtt_avg, the BBWC storage features a very low flush time, about 1ms
> or less. Everything else, including SSDs, are over that amount. The other odd
> result I see is that it takes a significant amount of time to get a flush
> command from the top of the block layer to the LLDD, though I suspect some of
> that might be waiting for the device to process earlier writes. Christoph has
> a patch that looks like it streamlines that, but it triggered various BUG_ONs
> when I booted with it, so I took the patch out.
We currently synchronize flush requests. There's no real reason to do
it except that we'll either need to make drivers accept flush requests
with a bio attached to them or find a workaround in the block layer to
submit it without bio without synchronizing them.
I thin kthat should be the first angle of attack before adding
complexity to filesystems.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-29 23:51 [RFC] ext4: Don't send extra barrier during fsync if there are no dirty pages Darrick J. Wong
2010-05-04 0:57 ` Mingming Cao
2010-05-04 14:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-05-04 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 12:48 ` tytso
2010-06-30 13:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 13:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 13:44 ` tytso
2010-06-30 13:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 13:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-06-30 19:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-07-21 17:16 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-21 17:16 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-03 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-03 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-04 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-03 13:21 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-03 13:24 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-03 13:24 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-04 23:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 2:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-05 2:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-05 16:17 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 19:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-05 20:39 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 20:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-05-04 19:49 ` Mingming Cao
2010-06-29 20:51 ` [RFC v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-05 16:40 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 16:45 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-05 16:45 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-06 7:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 7:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 10:17 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-09 19:53 ` [RFC v3] ext4: Combine barrier requests coming from fsync Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-09 19:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-09 21:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-16 16:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19 2:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-19 9:17 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-19 15:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-09 21:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-09 23:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-19 2:14 ` [RFC v4] ext4: Coordinate fsync requests Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-23 18:31 ` Performance testing of various barrier reduction patches [was: Re: [RFC v4] ext4: Coordinate fsync requests] Darrick J. Wong
2010-09-23 23:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-09-24 6:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-09-24 11:44 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-09-27 23:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-08 21:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-08 21:56 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-11 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-12 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15 23:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-15 23:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 0:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-11 14:33 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-18 22:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-10-19 18:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-08-06 7:13 ` [RFC v2] ext4: Don't send extra barrier during fsync if there are no dirty pages Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 7:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-06 18:04 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-09 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-08-09 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101019182817.GA11810@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcao@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.