From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:47:20 GMT Message-ID: <201010192247.o9JMlKa8020420@demeter1.kernel.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19702 --- Comment #26 from vyncere 2010-10-19 22:47:14 --- Hi all, So with my Core i5 520 M (2 physical cores, 4 logical cores): * 2.6.32.15 (ubuntu), 2.6.35.7 (kernel.org), 2.6.35.7 (kernel.org + 2 patchs) : - Values of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/affected_cpus are : "0", "1", "2" and "3" respectively for cpu0, cpu1, cpu2 and cpu3. - Output of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/related_cpus is always : "0 1 2 3" No problem. * 2.6.35.7 (kernel.org + 2 patchs) with and without boot parameter "processor.disable_hw_coord=1" : - Output of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/shared_type is always : 1 Always default value 1 (CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW) : so, Thomas, according to what you said, there is something wrong here... - cpufreq-info returns the same result as before (lowest freq). - /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold is 95 by default. - Lower the up_threshold has no effect for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.