All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: baruch@tkos.co.il (Baruch Siach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: fix spinlock recursion in adjust_pte()
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:28:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101022062825.GH6225@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287680982-22971-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@iki.fi>

Hi Mika,

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:09:42PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When running following code in a machine which has VIVT caches and
> USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is not defined:
> 
>   fd = open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY);
>   addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>   addr2 = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> 
>   v = *((int *)addr);
> 
> we will hang in spinlock recursion in the page fault handler:
> 
>   BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, mmap_test/717

[snip]

Do you have any idea when was this bug introduced? Does it affect already 
release kernels other than .36?

baruch

> Same thing can be achieved by running:
> 
>   # useradd dummy
> 
> This comes from the fact that when USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is not defined,
> the only lock protecting the page tables is mm->page_table_lock
> which is already locked before update_mmu_cache() is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> index 9b906de..56036ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,30 @@ static int do_adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#if USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
> +/*
> + * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page
> + * lock here.  Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock
> + * which is already locked, thus cannot take it.
> + */
> +static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Use nested version here to indicate that we are already
> +	 * holding one similar spinlock.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl)
> +{
> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
> +}
> +#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> +static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl) {}
> +static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) {}
> +#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS */
> +
>  static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  	unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> @@ -89,11 +113,11 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  	 */
>  	ptl = pte_lockptr(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
>  	pte = pte_offset_map_nested(pmd, address);
> -	spin_lock(ptl);
> +	do_pte_lock(ptl);
>  
>  	ret = do_adjust_pte(vma, address, pfn, pte);
>  
> -	spin_unlock(ptl);
> +	do_pte_unlock(ptl);
>  	pte_unmap_nested(pte);
>  
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 1.5.6.5

-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-22  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-21 14:12 BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0 Alexander Stein
2010-10-21 16:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-10-21 17:09   ` [PATCH RESEND] ARM: fix spinlock recursion in adjust_pte() Mika Westerberg
2010-10-22  6:28     ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2010-10-22  6:38       ` Mika Westerberg
2010-10-22  6:42         ` Baruch Siach
2010-10-22  7:08           ` Mika Westerberg
2010-10-22  8:01             ` Baruch Siach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101022062825.GH6225@tarshish \
    --to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.