From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damnshock Subject: Re: dual head inteldrmfb Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: <201010221628.43449.damnshock@gmail.com> References: <20102210004215@lilem.mirepesht> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com (mail-wy0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FC09E7B1 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so1015758wyf.36 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20102210004215@lilem.mirepesht> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thursday 21 October 2010 23:29:15 Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > Is it possible to have two inteldrmfb devices (/dev/fb[01]) > for two output ports using i915 without xorg? > > If not, is it possible to force the default inteldrmfb output > port? Here I want my framebuffer size match my netbook's > external LCD rather than its tiny display. Try fbpercrtc=1 as a kernel option