From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:56:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20101022175624.GA13640@kroah.com> References: <4CA653F0.1010008@vlnb.net> <4CA656AD.8020408@vlnb.net> <20101009212047.GB27180@kroah.com> <4CB36592.6060909@vlnb.net> <20101011213235.GA11489@kroah.com> <4CB4AEB9.30501@vlnb.net> <20101012190345.GA25737@kroah.com> <4CB75E81.7000208@vlnb.net> <20101014200413.GA30831@kroah.com> <4CC1CA4D.1090609@vlnb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC1CA4D.1090609@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel , James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , Mike Christie , Vu Pham , Bart Van Assche , James Smart , Joe Eykholt , Andy Yan , Chetan Loke , Dmitry Torokhov , Hannes Reinecke , Richard Sharpe , Daniel Henrique Debonzi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:30:53PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > + unsigned int tgt_kobj_initialized:1; It's the middle of the merge window, and I'm about to go on vacation, so I didn't read this patch after this line. It's obvious that this patch is wrong, you shouldn't need to worry about this. And even if you did, you don't need this flag. Why are you trying to do something that no one else needs? Why make things harder than they have to be. {sigh} greg k-h